Recently, George Siemens reported on his trip to Accra, Ghana for a conference on E-learning in June, 2008 . His post “E-Learning Africa “ lists six lessons that he learned from the experience. At least three of the lessons George listed resonated with me – I am going on my 10th year as an international consultant and teacher – Over these years I have worked in China, UAE, Jordan and Sri Lanka. I have learned much about the educational systems in these countries and am constantly reminded how much more I must learn if I am to be effective in aiding education in the countries I work.
It takes a lot of conversations to truly understand the plight of teachers, students, schools, and Ministries in any country different from that which nurtured one’s own educational ideals. To this end, I have started a small global project that hopes to join people who have an area of specialization in Education and a desire to learn more about other educational systems. I’m hoping to join educators from all around the world with teachers and students from classrooms with limited technology and connectivity. I’m not sure what the end product will be because it depends on the people who join on and the issues/initiatives they wish to tackle. Right now, it will mostly focus on teacher professional development through a participatory action research lens however, the ideal is to actually see classroom learning activities focusing on increasing the 21st Century Skills of students in developing countries. I sense there will be much to gain for everyone on the team, no matter their background, connectivity and experience.
The main idea is to work at solutions that reflected in three of George’s lessons…. – solutions which are:
Based on sound academic principles - “driven by commitment to core values and existing difficult conditions” (#5),
Cognizant of the financial and political agendas for education reform and therefore not simply an ‘extension of the ideals of development agencies and governments who provide funding’ (#4) and
Contextualized not an “export of ‘our’ solutions to problems we don’t fully understand” (#6).
A notworthy comment based on the last point above came from Karyn commenting on George’s post,
….. thank you so much for pointing out that “We are exporting our solutions to problems we don’t fully understand.” I keep saying this and I get the impression that people just roll their eyes at me. We keep talking about the flat world. I can’t say this emphatically enough: IT IS NOT FLAT. We collect in our so-called global conferences and Africa is not present. We discuss the issues that face us and come up with solutions. But we haven’t got a clue about the problems that face those who are not present. Yet we blithely expect them to apply our solutions. I’m sorry, but it smacks of “Let them eat cake.”
I am hoping to gather a team of great teachers and educational technologists from across the globe and particularly from developing countries to investigate effective technology integration and 21st Century Skills uptake in the developing world’s classrooms. I’m hopeful that through a focused approach of reaching out to those in the ‘unflat world’ - this project will not smack of “L.T.E.C.” - the first step will be the learning, awarenes and understanding from those in the ‘connected’ world of the diverse situations elsewhere. Admittedly, the hardest part of this initial phase is connecting with teachers, students and administrators in technology/connectivity limited situations.
I’m inviting anyone with such interests to join the “Connecting within the Unconnected Classroom Project”. You can find out more (and add to) this wiki: http://unconnectedclassroom.wetpaint.com/ .
To join the team, become a member of the “Unconnected Classroom Project” group in the Classroom 2.0 Ning and post an introduction.
[a version of this posting was submitted as a comment to George’s post]